
SOLUTIONS FOR FLUIDS, POWDERS & DRY BULK SOLIDS HANDLING | ORIFICE SLIDE GATE VALVE | DIVERTER VALVE | IRIS VALVE | LOSS IN WEIGHT GRAVIMETRIC FEEDER | VOLUMETRIC FEEDER | PELLET SCREENING & SORTING SYSTEM | KNIFE GATE VALVE | ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE | PINCH VALVE | ABRASIVE SLURRY VALVE | SEVERE DUTY GLOBE CONTROL VALVE
Wednesday, 23 November 2011
Ball valve seats suit hot transfer
Ruhrpumpen launches magnetic driven centrifugal process pump
The pump is maintenance-free and meets the requirements of the TA-Luft (German Technical Instruction on Air Quality Control) and has a 100% leak-free performance, the company says, due to the magnet drive technology. By using a non-metallic containment shell, such as one made of zirconium oxide, magnetic losses are eliminated, increasing pump efficiency and great energy savings. The containment shell is designed for 40 bar (580 psi) at 120°C and can be used up to an operating temperature of 250°C (482°F). The magnets are made of thermally stable samarium cobalt material (Sm2Co17) and are suitable in standard for a maximum allowable operating temperature of 250°C (300°C). Special magnet drive systems for an operating temperature up to 450°C are available.
The central assembly of the magnetic drive system over the journal bearing avoids moment loadings on the journal bearing, thus avoiding eccentric loading of the inner magnet carrier during startup and shut-down.
There are more than 130 hydraulic combinations available for the SCE-M pump, and three different impellers for each pump size are available. The patent pending axial and double radial journal bearing made of sintered silicon carbide (SSiC) are available as standard.
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
Addressing Welding Procedures Not Covered by ASME Section IX
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Q: My customer has rejected my welding procedure specification (WPS) and has asked me to address items that are not required by ASME Section IX. Is this reasonable? A: Yes, this is a reasonable request. In many cases, it is a good idea to address items not covered by Section IX1. Many people view any given ASME code section as a handbook, and assume that if they follow everything in that code section, they have met all necessary requirements. However, each ASME code section has verbiage in the foreword warning the user that merely following the rules in that particular section will not ensure an adequate design. Such wording is phrased in ways like: "The user of the Code should refer to other pertinent codes, standards, laws, regulations or other relevant documents," and "it is not intended that this Section be used as a design handbook; rather, engineering judgment must be employed in the selection of those sets of Code rules suitable to any specific service or need." For example, Section IX does not impose enough controls to ensure reliable weld joints because it does not address the proper choice of filler materials. Section IX would allow welding nickel alloys or copper alloys together using carbon steel filler, provided the qualification specimen passed the appropriate mechanical tests. Many variables are not required to be addressed in a Section IX WPS. But in many of these cases, a WPS that does not address those variables may not produce consistently reliable weld joints or provide adequate guidance to the welder, both of which should be the primary purpose of the WPS. The following are examples of factors Section IX does not require, but that should be considered for inclusion in a WPS: 1. There are supplementary essential variables not required to be addressed for a WPS to be used on materials that are not impact-tested. One such essential variable is heat input, which is calculated based on current, voltage and travel speed. If heat input does not need to be addressed, Section IX does not require including voltage or travel speed values. Some of the software packages for creating WPS documents will even omit this information automatically. On the other hand, if no voltage or travel speed values are specified, it is possible to follow the WPS and still produce unacceptable welds. Therefore, even though not required by Section IX, it is beneficial to include reasonable voltage and travel speed values on the WPS—even for materials that are not impact-tested. 2. For a WPS that involves carbon and alloy steels postweld heat-treated (PWHT) below the lower transformation temperature (LTT), Section IX only requires the WPS to indicate the PWHT must be below the LTT. Most WPSs for non-impact-tested carbon steels and alloy steels will actually state a PWHT temperature, but many omit the tolerance on this temperature and any soak time requirements. To ensure that proper strength, ductility and hardness requirements are met, a PWHT temperature range should be stated on the WPS. That temperature range should be based upon the PWHT temperature used on the qualification coupon, taking into consideration the effects of higher and lower temperature on the strength, ductility, hardness and toughness of the material. In addition, as a function of base metal thickness, guidance should be provided regarding the soak time, as well as providing absolute minimum and maximum allowable soak times. Again, strength, ductility, hardness and toughness of the material should be taken into account. 3. Section IX does not prohibit combining procedures that have been qualified in different ways, such as procedures qualified with and without PWHT, or procedures qualified with and without controls required for impact-tested materials. In fact, creating one WPS that covers non-impact-tested material (such as WCC) and impact-tested material (such as LCC), with and without PWHT is both possible and allowed. These procedures are handy when it is necessary to get a customer review. However, the combined procedures tend to be difficult for welders to follow because they usually contain a number of notes and tables, and for any given job it can be hard to determine what information actually applies. Although the combined approach is allowed, and although the combined document might be convenient from a creation and maintenance standpoint, it is actually better to create four separate WPS documents (non-impact without PWHT, non-impact with PWHT, impact without PWHT and impact with PWHT), because each WPS will then convey much more clearly the specific requirements for the pertinent situation. In summary, although Section IX imposes an abundance of rules for qualifying and writing WPSs, there are many instances where additional controls and information need to be conveyed to ensure results that meet the intended requirements of the weld. Therefore, if your customer makes a comment on your welding procedure, view it as a possible learning experience. In the end, your WPSs will be better for it. |
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Upstream & Downstream Pipeline Valves
This nation is crisscrossed by hundreds of thousands of miles of crucial pipelines that transport vital feedstock from sources to the places where it's transformed into fuel and products. For the valve industry, that translates into millions of dollars of business.
According to Hart Data and Mapping Services, the United States has over 700,000 miles of crude oil and natural gas pipelines—about 100,000 miles of crude onshore pipelines and over 600,000 miles of onshore gas pipelines. This number stands to greatly increase as drilling in the various shale plays across the continent occurs. These seemingly endless strings of pipe have one thing in common: They all contain large numbers of valves optimized for pipeline operating conditions.
WHAT'S IN A PIPELINE?
Both quarter-turn and multi-turn block valves as well as check valves are used in pipeline service. Those built for gas or crude oil pipeline service are designed and tested in accordance with the American Petroleum Institute (API) specification 6D "Pipeline Valves." The document, which is also published by the International Organization for Standardization as ISO 14313, includes requirements for gate, ball, check and plug type valves. Prior to the mid-1950s, the choice of valve for use in pipeline blocking applications was easy—gate valves were used because the pipeline ball valve had not been invented yet. Some plug valves also were used back then, but the majority of the designs for these valves were reduced-port type that were not piggable.
The term "piggable" has nothing to do with breakfast meat choices. Rather, it means being "pig-capable"—in other words, the devices designed to clean or inspect the interior of the pipeline (the "pigs") also may be passed through the bore of the valve without catching on a reduced bore or other interior projection in the valve. A requirement in API 6D gate valves is that their inside bore dimensions are precisely specified to allow this passage of pigs.
With the advent of quality pipeline ball valves over the past few decades, sales of pipeline gate valves have fallen. Meanwhile, pipeline ball valves, which are trunnion style, are now making inroads in all types of pipeline service, particularly in natural gas. Still, holdouts exist.
"Some companies are staunchly entrenched in the gate valve," according to David Fehrenkamp, a senior sales engineer with Cameron. He also adds that "in many natural gas pipeline operations, quarter-turn has taken over 100%."
So why do many pipeline owners favor the gate valve for pipeline service? Product pipelines that carry fluids such as gasoline, distillates, diesel fuel and other finished petroleum products are a popular place for the rough and ready gate valve. "We use slab gate valves for most of our main line valves, but we do use expanding gate valves on our product line from Texas City to Pasadena," says Billy Daigle, maintenance services specialist for Marathon Pipe Line LLC (MPL). "We use expanding gate valves for station isolation valves and pig launchers. Pig launcher and receiver service is harder on valves because of the debris from the pigging operation, so we choose expanding gates because of their toughness," he adds.
Ball, check and manifold valves are commonly used in pipeline service.
The quarter-turn vs. gate valve debate gets hotter when cost becomes the prime factor for selection. The quarter-turn trunnion pipeline ball valve is much cheaper to make than the jumbo-sized gate valves, with their large and expensive body castings. Another factor that tips the pendulum toward quarter-turn pipeline valves is the availability and delivery of quarter-turn products. Because drilling in the shale plays across the country is exploding in terms of how fast it's occurring, Fehrenkamp says the requests from customers for delivery time is "rush, rush, rush, I need it now!" A domestically produced trunnion pipeline ball valve can be built in roughly four weeks, which is about the time needed to get a good gate valve casting under the luckiest of circumstances. An additional four to six weeks might then be required to complete the gate valve machining, assembly and testing.
Some explanation is in order when speaking of pipeline gate valves. Gate valves used in this service are different from the wedge-type gate valves common in the downstream petrochemical and refining industries. The pipeline gates come in two basic types: slab and expanding wedge. The slab type utilizes a large slab that floats slightly in the valve body and seals downstream with the aid of upstream pressure. Spring-loaded seats are often employed to increase the sealing efficiency. The expanding gate, on the other hand, uses a split-disc design and separator mechanism that tightly expands the gate both upstream and downstream as the valve is closed. This type then reverses the process upon opening. The tighter closing design enables the valve to seat more effectively at lower pressures.
A QUESTION OF INTEGRITY
Valve integrity along with pipeline integrity is of prime importance to the pipeline owner as well as those who live and work close to the line. A complex formula for risk assessment is used to guide pipeline operators with inspection programs. The assessment criteria include the product, age of the pipeline, and proximity to population centers, local housing and occupied structures. The pipeline itself must be inspected at specified intervals. This line inspection is usually performed by "smart pigs," complex devices that roll through the line to perform radiography, remote visual, ultrasonic evaluation and other inspections.
Pig launchers are hard on valves because of the debris from the pigging operation.Valves, on the other hand, need their own inspection programs. The U.S. Department of Transportation has developed natural gas pipeline valve inspection criteria detailed in CFR Title 49, part 192, "The Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards." Paragraph 192.745 of that title states, "Each transmission line valve that might be required during any emergency must be inspected and partially operated at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year." Similar requirements are published for crude oil and hazardous liquid pipelines in CFR Title 49, part 195, "Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline," paragraph 195.420.
Proper valve maintenance is always vital, and pipeline valves are no exception. Since most pipeline valves have a seat sealant injection feature to facilitate tight closure, the sealant must be properly introduced into the seat seal area. New valves typically require more sealant top-off than those that have been in operation for a year or two.
Pipelines use a variety of valves to control fluids both above and below the ground.All pipeline operators have preventive maintenance (PM) and repair programs to ensure the life and functionality of their valves. Most companies will use a combination of in-situ repair along with shop refurbishments for tough repair cases. "We spend over 25% of our time in valve shops to get the valves just like we want them," says MPL's Daigle.
Because of the importance of proper pipeline valve repair, a specification that describes the repair procedure is in place: API 6DR, "Repair and Remanufacture of Pipeline Valves."
HOW PIPELINES WORK
Understanding how pipelines operate provides a better understanding of how valves are used in pipeline service. Major pipelines receive input from either smaller gathering lines, tank farms or, in the case of finished products, refineries and petrochemical plants. Because of friction losses, the arriving pressure of the fluid is much too low to provide enough energy to send the product very far through the line. Most transmission pipelines in the United States operate at maximum pressures of less than 1440 psi. Common maximum target pressures range from 700-725 psi and 1300-1400 psi, which equates to ANSI classes 300 and 600 respectively. These maximum pressures would only be found immediately downstream of pumps or compressors.
Because of the pressure drop in the line, booster pumping stations at intervals along the line are needed. In the case of a liquid such as crude oil, a minimum pressure of about 25-50 psi is needed for the suction side of the booster pumps to operate. Each booster pumping station is equipped with manifolds containing many valve types, including gate, ball, check, and in areas where pigging is not required, reduced port, lubricated plug valves. Additionally, control valves often are used to regulate flow from the stations.
The most common pressure class for pipeline transmission lines is class 600, which has a working pressure of 1440 psi. The valve ratings are in accordance with The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standard B16.34 and API 6D.
Valves play a critical role in keeping the nation's pipelines safe.Although a number of valves are in operation at each pumping station (for liquids) or compressor station (for gas transmission), the critical valves in a pipeline are spaced along its route. They serve as blocking or isolation valves to segregate pipeline sections for required maintenance or to help in cases of an accident. The minimum required spacing of these valves is prescribed in ASME B31.4, "Gas Transmission & Distribution Piping Systems" and ASME B31.8, "Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons & Other Liquids."
Several factors influence valve spacing, including: 1) the amount of potential fluid leakage, 2) the impact of a release, 3) future development in the pipeline area, and 4) the time required to blow down (empty) an isolated section. Other criteria include how close the line is to occupied buildings and houses. According to B31.4, the distance between block valves could be as little as four miles apart for a gas pipeline.
Slab gate valves are used along the pipeline systems.Liquid pipelines have their own criteria for valve placement. They are placed: 1) at the suction end and discharge ends of a pump station, 2) on each line entering or leaving a storage tank area, 3) on each mainline at locations along the pipeline that will limit damage or pollution from accidental hazardous liquid discharge, 4) on each lateral take-off from the trunk line, 5) on each side of a water crossing that is more than a 100 feet wide, and 6) on each side of a reservoir holding water for human consumption.
Additionally, check valves may be installed on grades and the downstream side of rivers and streams for more protection from backflow conditions in case of a line breach.
Many block valve installations are outfitted with automatic shutdown controls. These controls are set to close the valve if pressure or flow rates change, indicating a possible breach in the line. By having these valves spaced throughout the line, the amount of potential fluid leakage that might occur during a line break is limited. Additionally, many pipeline valves are designated as emergency shutdown valves (ESD), which are remotely operated from the pipeline control center.
These block valve location requirements account for the numerous small, fenced-in valve installations visible when driving around areas with many pipelines—numerous pipeline block valves are located above the ground for easy maintenance. However, some are buried, with only the operating mechanism and auxiliary lubrication and bleed lines showing. These installation areas used to be the exclusive domain of gate valves. However, today welded body trunnion-mounted ball valves are very popular, especially for clean natural gas transmission lines. The unique welded body construction eliminates the potential body-bonnet leak path, while the only remaining leak path is up through the packing area.
Though fugitive emissions (FE) leakage has been a focal point in the refining industry for over 20 years, the upstream and midstream markets have been fairly immune from FE scrutiny. However, that situation is changing. According to MPL's Daigle, "LDAR [leak detection and repair] for pipelines is becoming popular and required, especially since packing leaks are the most common leaks we deal with."
One place where emissions of any type are unacceptable to almost everyone is in undersea pipelines. Because they are surrounded by water and vibrant marine life, undersea pipelines certainly have their own set of challenges. However, there are other key differences from on-land pipelines that affect design, including the design of the valves attached to the pipelines.
For example, undersea pipelines that connect wellheads to gathering points often operate at much higher pressures than their onshore counterparts. It is not uncommon for these lines to see 10,000 psi. Valves designed for this submerged service are critical, purpose-built flow control devices that absolutely must work properly when called upon to operate. Because of the unique undersea environment, standard API 6D requirements are not deemed tough enough, so a special underwater valve specification was written to cover these products: API 6DSS "Specification for Subsea Pipeline Valves."
TESTING
Although interior pressures are also quite high in subsea pipelines, it is sometimes the outside pressure from the extreme depths that introduces the most stress on valves and piping. As a result, pipeline valves designed for installation at great depths are often tested in a hyperbaric chamber, where extreme pressure is exerted on the outside of the valve, while the inside is sealed against the external pressure.
All pipeline valves receive seat and shell tests per API 6D or 6DSS, not unlike their downstream counterparts, which are usually tested in accordance with API 598, "Valve Inspection & Testing." One difference between the two testing documents is that, with API 6D pipeline valves, the holding times for the tests are much longer. For example, a 24-inch valve shell tested per API 598 requires a five-minute duration, while the same size valve tested per API 6D requires a 30-minute duration. These longer holding times for pipeline valve tests are often extended into hours by the supplementary test requirements of many pipeline owners.
While pipelines and pipeline valves lie mostly invisible beneath six feet of earth or under 600 feet of ocean, they are nonetheless highly "visible" when an accident occurs. As a result, pipeline valves are closely scrutinized members of the valve family. They are built to tougher standards and must work every time because they must protect lives and property that lie near their installations. Pipeline valves could borrow the Latin motto of the United States Coast Guard, which is "Semper Paratus," which means: always ready.
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
NTPC to raise capacity to 128,000 Mw by 2032
Friday, 4 November 2011
NTPC to retrofit power plants to increase imported coal use
GE to launch 660, 800 Mw steam turbines
The steam turbine generator market in the country is expected to be around 10-12 GW per annum over next ten years. US conglomerate GE, which has been supplying steam turbines in the country for many decades, has a joint venture with Triveni steam turbines in the above 30 to 100 Mw range for power generation applications.
GE Energy’s businesses — comprising GE Oil & Gas, GE Power & Water and GE Energy Services — cover various areas including coal, nuclear energy, renewable resources and other alternative fuels.
L&T gets Rs 1,610 crore BOP order from Visa Power
BGR Energy power generation plans stalled
Thursday, 3 November 2011
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to set up new sunsidiary for power sector
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
Vibration Analysis Pinpoints Valve Noise Source
A refinery that shared a property line with local residents located and corrected a whining sound that threatened the peace of the community.
The beaches and vast expanse of the southern California coast serve as a drawing card both for recreation and residency. Yet while the sound of the ocean can prove refreshing and soothing, excessive noise from businesses, traffic, construction and industrial operations can disrupt and impact the quality of a community.
Such is the case today with a heavily populated, coastal California town that constantly strives to reduce noise and its impact within its urban environment. The city has a noise ordinance that establishes exterior noise standards by land use. The ordinance regulates a variety of noise generators, with a focus on commercial and heavy industrial operations.
One of the operations that is a source of problems is a major "in-town" refinery. However, the refinery constantly works to reduce its disturbances. In a recent case, they pinpointed and removed a noisy valve.
THE REFINERY
When founded over 90 years ago, the refinery was distant from heavily populated areas. Today, however, the refinery complex is tightly surrounded by areas consisting of industrial, commercially-zoned, recreational and residential properties.
Land use to the north of the refinery is primarily residential mixed with some commercial and light industrial zoning. Heavy industrial operations with a small parcel of commercial and multiple-family residences dominate the west side of the refinery, while to the east is a golf course along with light commercial and heavy industrial zones. The noise problem was most prevalent, however, at the southern length of the refinery, which borders single-family residences, separated from refining processes only by the width of a four-lane avenue.
The oil refinery is configured to produce large volumes of high-value, cleaner-burning gasoline and diesel fuels designed to meet the air quality standards of the California market. It has a capacity of over 300,000 barrels per day, but operates around the clock so the processing units contribute ambient noise to the surrounding neighborhoods. This noise is particularly troubling to residents who live on that southern border.
THE REFINING PROCESS IN A NUTSHELL
Typical mounting of accelerometer to valve stem.To understand the source of the noise, it is helpful to review the refining process itself. This particular refinery receives crude oil both from a marine terminal and by conventional pipeline. The oil is heated and processed in the crude unit for primary distillation and separation into various components. It is processed first in the crude distillation tower where the oil is fractionated into the following streams:
- Liquid and non-liquid petroleum gas products, such as fuel gas, propane and butane.
- Light liquid products (naphtha), which are further upgraded in the naphtha hydrotreater and platformer for subsequent blending into gasoline.
- Middle distillates (kerosene and diesel), which are produced from the middle of the distillation tower. The kerosene goes to either jet fuel blending, the distillate hydrotreater for ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) production or No. 6 fuel blending. The diesel goes to the distillate hydrotreater for ULSD production.
- The material remaining in the bottom of the crude distillation tower (the material is called atmospheric tower bottoms or ATB) is sent to the vacuum tower for further separation.
Magnetic mounting of an accelerometer to a pipe wall.The vacuum tower operates at less than atmospheric pressure and fractionates the ATB further. Vacuum gas-oil (VGO) recovered from the vacuum tower is then routed to the ISOMAX unit to be upgraded primarily into naphtha, kerosene and ultra-low sulphur diesel. The residual vacuum tower bottoms (VTB) stream is routed to the visbreaker.
THE OFFENDING UNIT
The ISOMAX unit (a unit that runs a patented and licensed hydrocracking process) uses high heat and pressure to upgrade the VGO through catalytic hydrogenation. This process removes contaminants and produces naphtha for gasoline blending and platformer feed, ULSD and jet fuel. The ISOMAX fractionation bottoms (frac bottoms) are sold as a valuable lubricant feedstock.
For many years, very loud harmonic noises (over 113 dBA, refer to Figure 1) were generated somewhere in the ISOMAX process unit near the hydrogen compressors and hydrogen quench control valves. Although the refinery hired an outside consulting firm to determine the exact source of the process unit noise, a problem that had increased over several years, the tests by the consultant were inconclusive.
The problem was exacerbated recently, when the ISOMAX unit began to generate noise that propagated beyond the refinery property line. In fact, the refinery received complaints from nearby residents about a continued, high-pitched whine.
Refinery engineers were uncertain how to resolve the issue since previous studies were inconclusive. Suspecting that control valves could be the potential noise source, they contacted the local business partner of their major valve supplier. Subsequent discussions led to consultation with the valve manufacturer's severe service group, which recommended using vibration-analysis-based, noise measurement equipment and processes.
PINPOINTING THE SOURCE
Accelerometers were mounted upstream and downstream of each quench valve as well as on the valve stem.Since the exact noise source could not be identified using acoustic sound pressure level measurement techniques, which was the process used earlier by the consulting firm, the efforts to measure vibrations began with a survey of the quench valve area to determine where to begin testing.
Accelerometers were used to allow testers to isolate a specific component for analysis, which leads to a systematic evaluation and subsequent elimination of suspect piping and valves.
To determine whether the noise source in this case was upstream of the valves with noise then propagating through the system, the accelerometers were mounted upstream and downstream of the motor-operated valves that feed the quench valves. Following measurements taken at these locations, the sensors then were placed immediately upstream and downstream of each quench valve, as well as mounted on the stem of each valve.
The highest piping vibration levels were found next to the quench valves, with the highest overall reading being taken on the valve stems. This finding indicated that the source or cause of the noise was most likely the valve trim components.
Stroking the quench valves was shown to impact the tone of the noise. Depending upon the travel, the tones would disappear, increase or change frequency.
The quench valves were 25-year-old units that used post guiding of the valve plug. In such valves, if the tolerance between the plug and valve body is too large, the plug/stem assembly can vibrate. If the assembly is excited at the resonance of the plug/stem component, the vibrations can cause tones.
NEW VALVES SOLVE THE PROBLEM
Working together, refinery engineers and engineers from the local valve sales office identified a valve configuration that could meet the required performance level and eliminate noise concerns.
A cage-guided valve design for high-pressure control requirements was chosen for its more stable operating capability. Also, a digital valve controller was added to each valve to allow optimizing control of the reactor temperature as well as to gain the ability to perform online valve diagnostics. All eight quench valves that were in the ISOMAX unit were replaced with this new valve configuration. The problems with noise were also helped out when the refinery installed a noise monitoring and early warning system to assist in identifying and subsequently controlling unwanted sound.
The result is that the refinery and the nearby community live much more comfortably side by side.
ANUP SHAH